Wednesday, 12 March 2014

Dramatic court reconstruction contradicts claim by Pistorius that he was wearing his prosthetic legs when he smashed down toilet door after shooting Reeva Steenkamp

  • Bullet-ridden door erected in courtroom along with recreation of cubicle
  • Forensic expert said marks are consistent with being hit with cricket bat
  • Colonel Vermeulen says Pistorius 'was not wearing his legs at the time'
  • Paralympian claims he put on his prosthetic legs before hitting the door
  • Angle of bullet holes suggests he was also on stumps when he fired gun
  • Prosecution has dropped argument he was wearing legs when he shot
  • State now says he smashed door on his stumps then fired his weapon
  • But forensics expert says that runner broke door only after he fired pistol
  • A forensic analyst staged a dramatic courtroom reconstruction today of the moment Oscar Pistorius broke down his toilet door with a cricket bat after shooting Reeva Steenkamp.
    Police colonel Johannes Vermeulen argued that Pistorius was on his stumps at the time, contradicting the Paralympian's assertion that he was wearing his prosthetic legs.
    The issue is critical to the case as it tests the athlete's assertions about exactly what happened on the night he killed Miss Steenkamp in his bathroom on Valentine's Day last year.
    Pistorius says he fearfully approached the bathroom on his stumps and shot Miss Steenkamp by mistake while believing she was an intruder.
    According to his account, he then put on his prostheses and tried to kick down the locked toilet door before hitting it with the bat after realising what he had done.
    Scroll down for videos
    Key evidence: Forensic analyst Colonel Johannes Vermeulen stands in front of the toilet door through which Oscar Pistorius shot Reeva Steenkamp while holding the cricket bat the athlete then used to break it down
    Key evidence: Forensic analyst Colonel Johannes Vermeulen stands in front of the toilet door through which Oscar Pistorius shot Reeva Steenkamp while holding the cricket bat the athlete then used to break it down
    Colonel Vermeulen takes part in the reconstruction in court
    Colonel Vermeulen takes part in the reconstruction in court
    Key moment: The re-enactment is critical to the case as it tests the athlete's assertions about exactly what happened on the night he killed Miss Steenkamp in his bathroom on Valentine's Day last year


    Reconstruction: Colonel Johannes Vermeulen of the South African Police Service stands in court in front of the toilet door through which Pistorius shot Reeva Steenkamp
    Reconstruction: Colonel Johannes Vermeulen of the South African Police Service stands in court in front of the toilet door through which Pistorius shot Reeva Steenkamp
    Evidence: Colonel Vermeulen kneels down to show that Pistorius was not wearing his prostheses at the time
    Evidence: Colonel Vermeulen kneels down to show that Pistorius was not wearing his prostheses at the time
    Analysis: The height at which the bat struck the door is measured in court in an attempt by the prosecution to determine whether Pistorius was on his prosthetic legs at the time
    Analysis: The height at which the bat struck the door is measured in court in an attempt by the prosecution to determine whether Pistorius was on his prosthetic legs at the time
    Demonstration: The forensic expert shows the point where the bat struck the door, causing it to splinter
    Demonstration: The forensic expert shows the point where the bat struck the door, causing it to splinter


    However, Col Vermeulen said the bat was used to hit the door from a low position and knelt and swung Pistorius's cricket bat to demonstrate his point.
    He also believed Pistorius was on his stumps when he fired through the toilet door, based on the angle of the bullet marks in the door, which was on display in the courtroom alongside a recreation of the cubicle.
     

    He told the court: 'The marks on the door are actually consistent with him not having his legs on and I suspect they must be similar to the height that he was when he fired the shots.'
    And in a dramatic climbdown, lead prosecutor Gerrie Nel also said that it was no longer part of the state's case that Pistorius was wearing his prosthetics at the time.
    That mistaken claim by prosecutors in the early part of the investigation was used by them to argue there was premeditation in the killing because they believed the disabled runner planned the killing while putting his prosthetics limbs on.
    Evidence: The bullet holes and shattered wood where Pistorius struck the door are clearly seen here
    Evidence: The bullet holes and shattered wood where Pistorius struck the door are clearly seen here
    Clues: Based on the angle and height of the four bullet holes seen here, Pistorius fired his gun on his stumps, according to forensic analyst Colonel Johannes Vermeulen
    Clues: Based on the angle and height of the four bullet holes seen here, Pistorius fired his gun on his stumps, according to forensic analyst Colonel Johannes Vermeulen

    Measurements: The court is shown a picture which Col Vermeulen took at the time of his initial investigation a few weeks after Miss Steenkamp was shot on Valentine's Day last year
    Measurements: The court is shown a picture which Col Vermeulen took at the time of his initial investigation a few weeks after Miss Steenkamp was shot on Valentine's Day last year


     

    No comments:

    Post a Comment